Loading content
Communities of Practice (CoPs) are informal, practice-oriented networks of professionals who share knowledge, solve problems, and develop skills collaboratively. CoPs enable tacit learning and innovation through regular interaction, shared resources, and common practices; they support capability building and organizational learning across team and domain bou…
Use this profile to understand the building block briefly, place it in the model, and switch to the 360° assessment when needed.
Theoretical construct: explains a term, principle, or mental model.
What organizes, connects, or makes decisions possible.
Communities of Practice are informal groups of professionals that form around a shared topic or practice to exchange experience, solve problems together, and build capabilities.
The approach grew out of the need to pass on hard-to-document experiential know-how across professionals and teams instead of relying only on manuals or formal training. Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger described the term in 1991 in Situated Learning; Wenger expanded it in 1998 in Communities of Practice and linked learning to social participation and identity development.
Think of a CoP as a learning loop with three parts: domain, community, and practice. The domain sets the focus, the community creates regular contact and trust, and the practice provides concrete cases, tools, and routines. Through conversation, examples, and joint work, experiences are generalized, tested, and fed back into the group.
The shared field of expertise that defines the group's focus and boundaries.
The social relationships in which trust, belonging, and regular exchange develop.
Shared routines, cases, tools, and stories through which the group learns.
The systematic transfer and reuse of knowledge and experience across people and teams.
Experiential know-how that is hard to document and becomes visible mainly in exchange.
What the group learns becomes useful beyond one team and feeds back into the organization.
The concept is useful when expertise must be retained across teams, onboarding should be shortened, or recurring problems need faster resolution. CoPs are especially valuable for complex, experience-heavy topics that do not fit neatly into formal process descriptions. They still require voluntary participation, time, and care; without clear focus or facilitation, exchange and documentation can fade.
Where this building block is located in the topic model.
Explore how this building block connects to concepts, methods, technologies, and tools.
These sources establish the term and its professional meaning.
All direct connections of the current building block in a compact text view.
This classification shows where the building block typically matters, how demanding it is, and what kind of impact it has in the model.
The level within the organization (enterprise, domain, team) at which the AssetBlock is applied.