Non-Functional Testing
A structured approach to plan and execute tests for non-functional requirements such as performance, scalability, security and reliability.
Classification
- ComplexityMedium
- Impact areaTechnical
- Decision typeArchitectural
- Organizational maturityIntermediate
Technical context
Principles & goals
Use cases & scenarios
Compromises
- Incorrect load profiles lead to misleading results
- Over-focusing on single metrics neglects overall behavior
- Test environments with production data carry compliance risks
- Run tests with production-like data and topologies
- Repeat scenarios regularly and maintain baselines
- Integrate tests into CI/CD and monitoring pipelines
I/O & resources
- Non-functional requirements and acceptance criteria
- Requirement profiles and load models
- Test environments, measurement tools and monitoring
- Test reports with metrics, thresholds and recommended actions
- Concrete optimization and capacity recommendations
- Regression tests and baselines for subsequent releases
Description
Non-functional testing is a structured method to evaluate system attributes such as performance, scalability, reliability, security and maintainability. It defines test scenarios, environments and metrics to validate non-functional requirements and supports architectural and operational decisions. It integrates with CI/CD and monitoring to enable continuous validation and regression control.
✔Benefits
- Early detection of performance and reliability issues
- Improved decision basis for architecture and capacity
- Reduced production outages through validated operational assumptions
✖Limitations
- High effort for realistic test environments
- Result interpretation requires domain and infrastructure knowledge
- Not all aspects can be fully reproduced in test environments
Trade-offs
Metrics
- Throughput (requests/s)
Measures number of successful requests per second under defined load.
- 95th percentile latency
Indicates how long most requests wait at most; important for SLAs.
- Error rate
Share of failed or rejected requests during tests.
Examples & implementations
Scaling test of a payments API
Load tests revealed DB contention; sharding and connection pooling improved throughput.
Resilience exercise after cloud migration
Chaos tests exposed missing timeouts; automatic circuit-breaker integration reduced failure impact.
Performance regression during release
Continuous performance tests detected a regression; hotfix and cache strategy optimization resolved the issue.
Implementation steps
Capture and prioritize non-functional requirements
Define test objectives, metrics and acceptance criteria
Create representative load profiles and scenarios
Automate tests and integrate into CI/CD
Analyze results, derive actions and update baselines
⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks
Technical debt
- Unchecked legacy components without performance profiles
- Missing automated tests for critical paths
- Outdated baselines that no longer reflect real load
Known bottlenecks
Misuse examples
- Performance engineers ignore functional changes and analyze only raw data
- Tests run only in small, non-representative environments
- Results published without concrete actions or responsibilities
Typical traps
- Wrong assumptions about user behavior in load modeling
- Insufficient isolation between test and production environments
- Lack of consideration for external integrations and third parties
Required skills
Architectural drivers
Constraints
- • Availability of realistic test data
- • Limited test infrastructure and costs
- • Time constraints in the release cycle