Catalog
method#AI#Data#Architecture#Software Engineering

Embedding Generation

A structured method to produce semantic vector representations for data (text, image, audio) to be used in search, classification and retrieval pipelines.

Embedding generation is a method to produce vector representations of inputs (text, images, audio) that capture semantic relationships for downstream tasks.
Established
High

Classification

  • High
  • Technical
  • Technical
  • Intermediate

Technical context

Vector DBs (e.g. Milvus, FAISS)Feature store and data pipelinesModel serving (TensorFlow Serving, TorchServe)

Principles & goals

Clear separation of training, indexing and serving pipelinesExplicit evaluation metrics and reproducibilityAssess pre-trained models versus task-specific fine-tuning
Build
Domain, Team

Use cases & scenarios

Compromises

  • Bias or undesired semantics from training data
  • Excessive complexity from unvetted model variants
  • Scaling issues for latency-sensitive applications
  • Start with pre-trained models and evaluate fine-tuning only if needed
  • Explicit tests for robustness against domain drift
  • Instrument latency, cost and quality metrics

I/O & resources

  • Raw inputs (text, images, audio)
  • Annotations or labels (if needed for training)
  • Compute resources for training/indexing
  • Embedding vectors and index
  • Evaluation metrics and reports
  • Production-ready serving pipeline

Description

Embedding generation is a method to produce vector representations of inputs (text, images, audio) that capture semantic relationships for downstream tasks. It covers model selection, dimensionality, normalization and evaluation. The method guides when to use pre-trained models, fine-tuning, or task-specific embedding pipelines, and highlights trade-offs in latency, storage and downstream effectiveness.

✔

  • Improved semantic search and retrieval accuracy
  • Compact representation of heterogeneous data
  • Reusable features for multiple downstream tasks

✖

  • High storage and compute needs for large embedding indexes
  • Quality highly dependent on data and preprocessing
  • Domain drift requires regular re-indexing or fine-tuning

  • Recall@k

    Share of relevant hits in the top-k results as a retrieval quality measure.

  • Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR)

    Average reciprocal rank of relevant hits to evaluate ranking.

  • Latency p50/p95

    Distribution-based latency metrics to assess real-time performance.

Product search index with Sentence-BERT

An online store uses pre-trained Sentence-BERT models to vectorize product descriptions and enable semantic search.

Customer query classification

Support tickets are converted into embeddings and prioritized by a classifier to support routing and SLA optimization.

RAG for knowledge-based assistance

A RAG setup combines document embeddings with an LLM to provide more precise and contextual answers.

1

Data analysis and definition of quality metrics

2

Selection and evaluation of base models

3

Implement training/index/serving pipeline and monitoring

⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks

  • Non-quantized models increase storage and latency costs
  • Ad-hoc data pipelines without versioning
  • No automated re-indexing on data changes
Index storageServing latencyBatch indexing
  • Using very high-dimensional embeddings in latency-critical APIs
  • Relying on embeddings for legal or compliance decisions without audit
  • No updates despite significant domain shift
  • Misinterpreting distance measures as absolute relevance
  • Underestimating costs for index replication
  • Lack of monitoring for embedding drift
Machine learning fundamentals and model evaluationKnowledge of vector indexing and retrievalScalable systems and infrastructure skills
Application latency requirementsScalability of the embedding indexData ownership and privacy requirements
  • • Limited storage for vector indexes
  • • Regulatory constraints for personal data
  • • Hardware limitations for on-premise serving