Data Validation
Method for systematic verification of data quality and conformity using rules, validation pipelines, and error handling.
Classification
- ComplexityMedium
- Impact areaTechnical
- Decision typeArchitectural
- Organizational maturityIntermediate
Technical context
Principles & goals
Use cases & scenarios
Compromises
- Overly strict rules block legitimate inputs
- Missing or inconsistent rules create silent data errors
- Security gaps with inadequate input sanitation
- Central rule library with versioning
- Combine client- and server-side validation
- Clear error format and consistent status codes
I/O & resources
- Data feeds or API payloads
- Schema definitions or validation rules
- Context information (user, version, source)
- Validated data or error reports
- Metrics and dashboards for data quality
- Audit logs and remediation tasks
Description
Data validation is a structured method to verify and ensure correctness, completeness and consistency of data across pipelines and interfaces. It defines rules, formats and thresholds, combining automated checks with feedback and error handling. Applicable to APIs, databases and ETL processes.
✔Benefits
- Reduced error rates and less rework
- Improved data quality and reliable aggregations
- Faster fault localization through standardized reports
✖Limitations
- Validation alone does not fix incorrect business logic
- High effort for heterogeneous legacy systems
- Performance overhead for very large datasets
Trade-offs
Metrics
- Validation error rate
Percentage of invalid records relative to total input.
- Validation pipeline throughput
Number of processed entries per second.
- MTTR for data incidents
Mean time to remediate detected data issues.
Examples & implementations
API validator in order service
An e-commerce team used JSON Schema to validate order payloads and reduced backend error cases by 40%.
ETL quality checks for marketing data
Marketing data were automatically checked before aggregation; inconsistencies triggered automated remediation steps and notifications.
Migration validation during CRM migration
Validation rules were used during migration to find mapping errors and minimize rollbacks.
Implementation steps
Gather requirements and data models
Define validation rules and schemas
Implement and integrate validation components
Set up automated tests and monitoring
Organize operation and continuous rule maintenance
⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks
Technical debt
- Hard-coded validation logic across multiple services
- Old rule versions without migration path
- No test suites for validation rules
Known bottlenecks
Misuse examples
- Blocking all non-exact matching formats without fallback
- Ignoring data security checks during validation
- Relying on human review instead of automated checks
Typical traps
- Defining rules too restrictively and hard to loosen later
- Unconsidered variants of input formats
- Lack of observability conceals root causes
Required skills
Architectural drivers
Constraints
- • Legacy formats and non-standardized interfaces
- • Real-time requirements with low latency
- • Regulatory requirements for data retention