Quality Assurance (QA)
Quality assurance comprises strategies, processes and activities that ensure products and services meet requirements and that defects are detected early.
Classification
- ComplexityMedium
- Impact areaOrganizational
- Decision typeOrganizational
- Organizational maturityIntermediate
Technical context
Principles & goals
Use cases & scenarios
Compromises
- Focus on metrics instead of actual customer experience.
- Silos between development and QA lead to ineffective collaboration.
- Late QA involvement increases defect remediation costs.
- Shift-left: involve QA early in requirements and design.
- Automate where it delivers stable value.
- Use metrics to prioritize actions based on data.
I/O & resources
- Requirement specifications and acceptance criteria
- Test environments and test data
- Access to monitoring and log data
- Test reports and metrics
- Release and support decisions
- Improvement actions and tickets
Description
Quality Assurance (QA) is a comprehensive approach for systematically ensuring product and process quality. It combines organizational responsibility, defined testing and improvement processes, and metrics for transparency. QA aims to reduce defect sources and embed continuous improvement across development and operations.
✔Benefits
- Reduction of production defects and related costs.
- Improved customer satisfaction through more reliable products.
- Higher release predictability and reduced downtime.
✖Limitations
- QA may require organizational change costs and training effort.
- Excessive formalization can hinder flexibility and innovation.
- Not all defects can be fully covered by tests.
Trade-offs
Metrics
- Defect density
Number of found defects per code or function unit as a quality indicator.
- Mean Time to Detect (MTTD)
Average time until detection of a defect in test or production.
- Test coverage
Percentage of code or application areas covered by automated tests.
Examples & implementations
Enterprise QA program
Organization implements central QA governance with metrics, training and tooling to unify practices.
CI-driven test automation
Teams integrate comprehensive test suites into CI pipelines to prevent regressions before merges.
QA as a service for product teams
Central QA team offers consulting, reviews and test automation as a service to decentralized product teams.
Implementation steps
Assess current QA practices and tooling
Define shared quality metrics and SLAs
Build automated tests and integrate into CI
Introduce governance, reviews and continuous monitoring
⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks
Technical debt
- Outdated test infrastructure causing slow feedback loops.
- Poorly maintained test data stores with inconsistent states.
- High number of flaky tests without investment in stabilization.
Known bottlenecks
Misuse examples
- Searching all defects by manual testing instead of risk-based prioritization.
- Manipulating metrics to hit targets instead of improving quality.
- Applying automation to volatile UI elements without stabilization.
Typical traps
- Too high expectations of automation without maintenance capacity.
- Ignoring organizational causes in favor of technical measures.
- Viewing metrics in isolation without context and root-cause analysis.
Required skills
Architectural drivers
Constraints
- • Budget and time constraints for test automation
- • Regulatory requirements for audit and compliance
- • Legacy systems with poor testability