ISO/IEC 42010
International standard for architecture description of systems and software defining views, viewpoints and stakeholder requirements.
Classification
- ComplexityMedium
- Impact areaOrganizational
- Decision typeArchitectural
- Organizational maturityAdvanced
Technical context
Principles & goals
Use cases & scenarios
Compromises
- Over-documentation without decision-making value
- Incomplete views lead to wrong decisions
- Lack of maintenance of architecture descriptions in operations
- Focus on few relevant viewpoints per stakeholder group
- Continuous maintenance and linkage to decisions
- Automated checks for conformance and completeness
I/O & resources
- Stakeholder list
- Functional and non-functional requirements
- System context and interface description
- Architecture documentation (views, viewpoints)
- Traceability matrices and decision records
- Governance and conformance reports
Description
ISO/IEC 42010 is an international standard for architecture description of systems and software. It defines concepts such as stakeholders, viewpoints, and views, and specifies requirements for architecture documentation and frameworks. The standard enables consistent, traceable architecture communication and supports governance across projects.
✔Benefits
- Increased consistency in architecture representations across teams
- Improved traceability of decisions and requirements
- Facilitates governance and compliance audits
✖Limitations
- Increased documentation effort, particularly initially
- Requires disciplined stakeholder collaboration
- Standard does not fully prescribe format; interpretation variance remains
Trade-offs
Metrics
- Number of maintained views
Counts active and up-to-date architecture representations.
- Traceability ratio
Ratio of documented decisions to their associated requirements.
- Stakeholder coverage
Percentage of relevant stakeholders for whom views exist.
Examples & implementations
Enterprise architecture repository
Central collection of views and viewpoints for an enterprise IT portfolio.
Product-line architecture documentation
Documentation of common and variable elements within a product family.
Architecture decision record
Traceable record of architecture decisions with associated views.
Implementation steps
Identify stakeholders and prioritize viewpoints
Introduce templates for views and architecture documents
Run pilots in one domain and incorporate feedback
Establish governance processes and maintenance cycles
⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks
Technical debt
- Stale views without traceability to current implementations
- Missing automation for conformance checks
- Inconsistent terminology usage in architecture descriptions
Known bottlenecks
Misuse examples
- Documentation used as sole control mechanism without review
- Mandatory full formalization in every iteration
- Using the standard as a pure compliance label
Typical traps
- Strict adherence to templates prevents sensible deviations
- Neglecting operational aspects when estimating documentation effort
- Unclear responsibilities for maintenance and updates
Required skills
Architectural drivers
Constraints
- • Existing organizational processes and tools
- • Limited capacity for initial documentation
- • Confidentiality and compliance requirements