Catalog
concept#Software Engineering#Architecture#DevOps#Reliability

Functional Programming

A declarative programming paradigm that models computation as evaluation of pure functions without side effects.

Functional programming is a declarative programming paradigm that models computation as evaluation of pure functions without side effects.
Established
High

Classification

  • High
  • Technical
  • Architectural
  • Intermediate

Technical context

JVM ecosystem (Scala, Kotlin with FP libraries)JavaScript/TypeScript (RxJS, Immutable.js)Haskell toolchain and ecosystem

Principles & goals

Immutability of dataPure functions without side effectsComposition over centralization
Build
Enterprise, Domain, Team

Use cases & scenarios

Compromises

  • Excessive abstraction leads to hard-to-maintain code
  • Skill shortage delays projects
  • Misapplication in IO-intensive systems can degrade performance
  • Start small with isolated modules and expand iteratively.
  • Encapsulate side effects and keep core logic pure.
  • Use strong typing to document invariants.

I/O & resources

  • Programming language or runtime with FP support
  • Test infrastructure for isolated unit tests
  • Training and guidelines for developers
  • Pure, composable modules
  • Immutable data models
  • Explicit side-effect adapters

Description

Functional programming is a declarative programming paradigm that models computation as evaluation of pure functions without side effects. It emphasizes immutable data, pure functions and composition, improving testability, concurrency and formal reasoning. Adoption shapes module boundaries, state management and architectural design in software systems.

✔

  • Improved testability via pure functions
  • Better reasoning and formal properties
  • Fewer bugs due to controlled side effects

✖

  • Steep learning curve for developers without FP experience
  • Some runtime optimizations and side effects are harder to model
  • Integration with existing mutable codebases can be costly

  • Defect rate per 1,000 LOC

    Measures defect density as an indicator of code quality after adopting FP principles.

  • Unit test coverage

    Percentage of functions covered by unit tests, especially pure functions.

  • Latency and throughput

    Performance metrics to assess pipelines and concurrent processing.

Haskell backend service

Microservice implemented in Haskell uses pure functions and the type system to avoid errors.

Reactive streams in Scala

Data pipeline using Akka Streams implements transformation stages as functions without side effects.

Frontend with Redux and pure selectors

UI logic made testable and predictable via pure selectors and immutable state trees.

1

Identify and extract a pilot module with pure functions.

2

Encapsulate side effects in adapters and define interfaces.

3

Introduce automated tests for pure functions.

4

Adapt tooling and CI pipelines for immutable artifacts.

5

Conduct training and pair programming for knowledge sharing.

⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks

  • Partially introduced FP practices without consistency rules
  • Old mutable utilities that impede integration
  • Missing tooling support in CI for FP-specific checks
Onboarding timeTooling gapsIntegration with legacy
  • Applying FP principles blindly in performance-critical loops.
  • Suppressing all side effects instead of modeling them explicitly.
  • Adoption without training leads to inconsistent style and tech debt accumulation.
  • Confusing functional style with lack of modularity.
  • Premature optimization instead of clear, testable models.
  • Insufficient measurement of runtime costs after refactorings.
Understanding of pure functions and immutabilityFunctions and higher-order functionsExperience with test and build tooling for FP languages
MaintainabilityConcurrencyTestability
  • • Existing mutable codebase
  • • Real-time or hard real-time requirements
  • • Limited runtime optimizations in certain environments