Catalog
concept#Artificial Intelligence#Analytics#Data#Software Engineering

Explainable AI

Methods and tools that make AI model decisions transparent, interpretable and verifiable to support trust, compliance and debugging.

Explainable AI (XAI) comprises techniques for representing and assessing the decision basis of machine learning models.
Emerging
High

Classification

  • High
  • Business
  • Architectural
  • Intermediate

Technical context

TensorFlow and PyTorch modelsMonitoring and observability toolsData governance and catalog systems

Principles & goals

Transparency: Explanations should be traceable and reproducible.Validity: Explanations must reflect the model's decision mechanics realistically.Audience-appropriate: Tailor presentation to both experts and lay users.
Build
Domain, Team

Use cases & scenarios

Compromises

  • Overreliance on flawed or superficial explanations.
  • Privacy breaches due to overly detailed explanations.
  • Misuse of explanations to obfuscate decisions.
  • Clarify explanation requirements early with stakeholders.
  • Combine and validate model-agnostic methods.
  • Document assumptions, limitations and evaluation metrics.

I/O & resources

  • Trained model (weights/artifacts)
  • Access to training and evaluation data
  • Requirements from regulators and stakeholders
  • Explanation artifacts (e.g. feature attributions)
  • Audit and compliance reports
  • Visual or textual user-facing explanations

Description

Explainable AI (XAI) comprises techniques for representing and assessing the decision basis of machine learning models. It enables stakeholders to understand model behavior, detect bias and meet regulatory requirements. XAI is particularly relevant in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, finance and public administration.

✔

  • Increased trust of users and stakeholders in model decisions.
  • Support for compliance and audit requirements.
  • Improved error detection and targeted model improvement.

✖

  • Explanations are often approximate and do not always reflect causality.
  • Trade-offs between explainability and model performance possible.
  • Interpretations can be subjective and hard to understand for laypersons.

  • Fidelity

    Measure of how well the explanation represents model behavior locally or globally.

  • Stability/Consistency

    Degree of consistency of explanations under small input perturbations.

  • Explanation latency

    Time required to generate an explanation in production environments.

Healthcare risk model with Shapley explanations

Use of SHAP to break down individual risk predictions and detect problematic features.

Loan decision transparency in banking

Combination of rule-based and explainable ML components to meet regulatory reporting obligations.

Explanations in a customer service chatbot

Integration of concise, understandable explanations for chatbot recommendations to increase user trust.

1

Needs analysis: identify stakeholder and regulator requirements.

2

Select explanation approaches (model-agnostic vs. model-specific) and tools.

3

Integrate into ML pipeline, test explanation quality and set up monitoring.

⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks

  • Ad-hoc scripts for explanation computation without tests.
  • Missing automation for re-evaluation after model changes.
  • Insufficient documentation of explanation assumptions and parameters.
Explanation computation latencyCompute cost for detailed analysesAccess restrictions to training data
  • Using saliency maps as the sole safety clearance.
  • Using explanations to obscure model errors.
  • Interpreting feature importances as proof of causality.
  • Not validating assumptions about causality.
  • Overlooking privacy risks from overly detailed explanations.
  • Insufficiently testing explanation metrics and drawing wrong conclusions.
Machine learning and model understandingStatistics and evaluation methodsDomain knowledge for interpreting explanations
Regulatory requirements and auditabilityModel complexity and transparencyIntegration needs with monitoring and data governance
  • • Limited access to sensitive or proprietary data
  • • Compliance with data protection regulations
  • • Limited availability of suitable explanation libraries for all model types