Enterprise Architecture
An organization-wide architectural practice aligning business strategy, processes and IT through principles, models and governance.
Classification
- ComplexityHigh
- Impact areaOrganizational
- Decision typeArchitectural
- Organizational maturityAdvanced
Technical context
Principles & goals
Use cases & scenarios
Compromises
- Centralized decision bottlenecks delaying projects.
- Unclear governance leads to inconsistencies in implementations.
- Excessive standardization can stifle innovation.
- Work iteratively and incrementally, closely align with delivery teams
- Formulate clear, easily applicable architecture principles
- Use automated compliance checks and architecture dashboards
I/O & resources
- Business strategy, goals and KPIs
- Inventory of existing systems, data flows and interfaces
- Non-functional requirements and compliance constraints
- Target architecture models and roadmaps
- Governance policies and decision guidelines
- Metrics and dashboards for architecture performance
Description
Enterprise architecture defines an organization’s high-level structure, principles, and standards to align business strategy with IT systems. It provides models, decision rules and roadmaps for capability development and integration. EA guides governance, technology choices and organizational change by making architectures explicit and traceable across initiatives.
✔Benefits
- Better alignment of IT investments with business value.
- Reduction of redundancies and technical debt.
- Improved decision basis for technology and platform choices.
✖Limitations
- Effort and time required to build and maintain the architecture.
- Risk of bureaucratization without clear focus on benefits.
- Difficulty reconciling short-term delivery needs with long-term architecture.
Trade-offs
Metrics
- Architecture compliance
Percentage of implementations complying with defined architecture principles.
- Integration effort
Average effort (person-days) to integrate new systems.
- Total cost of ownership
Total lifecycle cost for platforms and interfaces.
Examples & implementations
TOGAF-based EA implementation
Establishing an EA function with reference architectures, roadmaps and governance based on TOGAF principles.
Domain-oriented architecture at a large bank
Introduction of domain-specific architecture blueprints to decouple systems and accelerate delivery.
Platform modernization in a utility
Phased migration to a shared platform with governance, API standards and a migration roadmap.
Implementation steps
Define EA governance and roles
Conduct current-state analysis and create reference models
Derive target architecture, roadmap and metrics
⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks
Technical debt
- Legacy systems with high integration costs
- Inconsistent interfaces and data models
- Lack of automation for compliance checks
Known bottlenecks
Misuse examples
- Using EA purely as documentation without decision authority
- Compulsive standardization that blocks time-to-market
- Ignoring local business needs in favor of central rules
Typical traps
- Unclear success criteria and missing metrics
- Overemphasis on tools instead of processes
- Not involving stakeholders early enough
Required skills
Architectural drivers
Constraints
- • Budget and time constraints for transformation projects
- • Regulatory requirements and compliance constraints
- • Existing legacy systems and dependencies