Distributed Computing
A concept for distributing computation across multiple networked nodes to achieve scalability, fault tolerance and performance. Includes coordination, consistency models and communication protocols.
Classification
- ComplexityHigh
- Impact areaTechnical
- Decision typeArchitectural
- Organizational maturityAdvanced
Technical context
Principles & goals
Use cases & scenarios
Compromises
- Inconsistent data due to incorrect replication strategy
- Network partitions causing unexpected behavior
- Operational overhead and troubleshooting can consume resources
- Small, independent services with clear interfaces
- Idempotent operations and explicit retries
- Automated tests for network failures and partitions
I/O & resources
- Network topology and latency profiles
- Consistency and availability requirements
- Monitoring and observability tooling
- Architecture design with distributed components
- Operational metrics, SLAs and recovery plans
- Implemented replication and consistency mechanisms
Description
Distributed computing denotes architectures where computational tasks are spread across multiple networked nodes. It covers consistency, fault tolerance, coordination mechanisms, and communication protocols. The goal is scalable, resilient, and efficient processing of distributed applications. Typical domains include distributed databases, microservices, edge computing, and large-scale data platforms.
✔Benefits
- Scalability via horizontal distribution of load
- Increased fault tolerance through redundancy
- Proximity to data sources reduces latency (edge options)
✖Limitations
- More complex failure cases and coordination required
- Stricter requirements for observability and testing
- Consistency models can increase developer complexity
Trade-offs
Metrics
- Request success rate
Ratio of successful to failed requests over time; indicates stability and error frequency.
- P95/P99 latency
Percentile-based latency measurements, important for service-level requirements.
- Replication lag
Delay between primary update and visibility on replicas.
Examples & implementations
Distributed key-value stores (etcd)
etcd provides distributed configuration and service discovery with strong consistency via Raft.
MapReduce clusters for batch processing
Batch processing of distributed data sets across a cluster with coordinated tasks.
Globally distributed databases
Databases that provide geographically distributed replication and specialized consistency models.
Implementation steps
Requirements analysis: define consistency, latency, throughput
Build and test prototypes for critical paths
Introduce observability (metrics, tracing, logging)
Perform incremental rollouts and chaos testing
⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks
Technical debt
- Ad-hoc replication without clear consistency guarantees
- Lack of observability standards causes later remediation work
- Tight coupling between services hinders later scaling
Known bottlenecks
Misuse examples
- Incorrect replication strategy leads to data loss
- Optimizing solely for throughput without latency considerations breaks SLAs
- Deploying without chaos tests causes undetected weaknesses
Typical traps
- Overestimating deterministic network conditions
- Neglecting data locality requirements
- Insufficient fallback strategies for consistency conflicts
Required skills
Architectural drivers
Constraints
- • Limited network capacity and variable latency
- • Regulatory requirements for data locality
- • Budget for redundant infrastructure and observability