Conway's Law
Conway's Law describes the relationship between an organization's structure and the architecture of the systems it produces.
Classification
- ComplexityMedium
- Impact areaOrganizational
- Decision typeDesign
- Organizational maturityIntermediate
Technical context
Principles & goals
Use cases & scenarios
Compromises
- Misunderstandings between teams can impair efficiency.
- Difficulties in integrating new team structures.
- Lack of management support can jeopardize success.
- Regularly review team structures.
- Promote an open communication culture.
- Train employees in agile methods.
I/O & resources
- Organizational Structure
- Goals of Software Development
- Current Software Architecture
- Optimized Team Structure
- Improved Software Architecture
- Increased Efficiency
Description
Conway's Law states that an organization's structure influences the structure of the software it develops. If a company is organized in silos, the software is likely to be structured in silos as well. This has far-reaching implications for efficiency, communication, and ultimately the success of software projects.
✔Benefits
- Improved team communication.
- More efficient software development.
- Increased flexibility in software architecture.
✖Limitations
- Can lead to silos if not implemented correctly.
- Requires continuous adjustment of team structures.
- Can provoke resistance to change.
Trade-offs
Metrics
- Team Productivity
Measurement of team efficiency and productivity.
- Communication Quality
Assessment of the effectiveness of communication between teams.
- Software Quality
Measurement of the quality of the developed software.
Examples & implementations
Successful Transition to Agile Methods
A company changed its structure to integrate agile methods, resulting in a significant improvement in software quality.
Optimizing Software Architecture through Team Restructuring
By restructuring the teams, the software architecture was simplified and maintainability increased.
Increasing Efficiency through Cross-Functional Teams
A company found that cross-functional teams increased efficiency and reduced time to market.
Implementation steps
Analyze the current team structure.
Identify areas for improvement.
Implement the new team structure.
⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks
Technical debt
- Outdated technologies due to lack of adaptation.
- Difficulties in integrating new systems.
- Insufficient documentation of the software architecture.
Known bottlenecks
Misuse examples
- Introducing silos in the team structure.
- Resistance to agile methods.
- Insufficient training of employees.
Typical traps
- Assuming that structure has no impact.
- Overlooking the importance of communication.
- Sticking to old habits.
Required skills
Architectural drivers
Constraints
- • Regulatory requirements for software development.
- • Budget constraints.
- • Technological limitations.