Agile Delivery
Approach for iterative, customer-focused delivery of software and products.
Classification
- ComplexityMedium
- Impact areaOrganizational
- Decision typeOrganizational
- Organizational maturityIntermediate
Technical context
Principles & goals
Use cases & scenarios
Compromises
- Fragmented technical quality without architecture governance
- Overemphasis on speed instead of sustainability
- Lack of long-term product vision
- Regular retrospectives for continuous improvement
- Automate tests and releases
- Close dialog with real users
I/O & resources
- Product vision and strategic goals
- Prioritized backlog
- Cross-functional team skills
- Validated product increments
- Learning points and hypothesis validation
- Adjusted roadmap
Description
Agile Delivery describes principles and practices for rapid, iterative delivery of customer value. It combines cross-functional teams, incremental planning, and continuous feedback to reduce uncertainty and accelerate value creation. Organizations design flow, metrics, and learning cycles to achieve sustainable outcomes.
✔Benefits
- Faster hypothesis validation
- Greater customer centricity
- Lower risk through small, frequent releases
✖Limitations
- Requires cultural change
- Not immediately suitable for all regulatory requirements
- Scaling requires additional coordination mechanisms
Trade-offs
Metrics
- Time-to-Market
Time from idea to usable increment.
- Throughput
Number of delivered increments per time unit.
- Customer satisfaction (NPS/CSAT)
Measure of perceived value delivered to users.
Examples & implementations
Spotify model as organizational reference
Spotify used autonomous squads and chapters to accelerate delivery and learning.
MVP launch for a financial product
A small team delivered an MVP quickly, validated demand and iterated features.
Regulatory adjustment in iterations
Organization implemented compliance requirements incrementally to minimize disruption risks.
Implementation steps
Create awareness and define product vision
Form cross-functional teams and clarify responsibilities
Set up backlog and determine MVP focus
Introduce short iteration cycles and measure
Institutionalize learning cycles and adapt processes
⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks
Technical debt
- Quick patches without refactoring
- Insufficient test coverage due to short-term releases
- Outdated integration interfaces
Known bottlenecks
Misuse examples
- Running Scrum ceremonies without substantive adaptation
- Optimizing only feature output, not outcomes
- Granting autonomy without clear accountability
Typical traps
- Ignoring early automation deficits
- Collecting stakeholder feedback too late
- Centralizing architecture decisions too late
Required skills
Architectural drivers
Constraints
- • Regulatory requirements may slow iterations
- • Limited personnel capacity
- • Legacy architecture with high integration effort