Digital Forensics
Digital forensics covers methods and processes for identifying, collecting and analysing digital evidence. The aim is to preserve evidence integrity to support incident response, forensic investigations and legal proceedings.
Classification
- ComplexityHigh
- Impact areaTechnical
- Decision typeOrganizational
- Organizational maturityAdvanced
Technical context
Principles & goals
Use cases & scenarios
Compromises
- Contamination of evidence due to improper handling.
- Breaks in chain-of-custody may render evidence inadmissible.
- Misinterpretation of artifacts without contextual knowledge.
- Use standardized, documented procedures for collection and analysis
- Ensure integrity via hashing and redundant storage
- Regular training and tabletop exercises for forensic readiness
I/O & resources
- Endpoint images and memory dumps
- Network captures and proxy logs
- Authentication and application logs
- Forensic findings and reports
- Secure copies and artifact repository
- Legally admissible chain-of-custody documentation
Description
Digital forensics is the discipline of identifying, collecting, preserving, and analysing digital evidence to support incident response, legal proceedings, and threat attribution. It defines procedures, tools and governance to ensure evidence integrity and legal admissibility. Forensic readiness reduces investigation time and preserves chain-of-custody.
✔Benefits
- Enables root-cause analysis and attribution of security incidents.
- Supports legal actions with court-admissible evidence.
- Improves incident response via preparedness and documented processes.
✖Limitations
- Resource intensive: time and specialised tools required.
- Legal constraints vary across jurisdictions.
- Incomplete telemetry or encrypted data can limit analysis.
Trade-offs
Metrics
- Time to evidence preservation
Time between incident detection and secure preservation of relevant evidence.
- Number of preserved artifacts per incident
Count of secured files, images and log segments used for analysis.
- Time to forensic report completion
Duration until completion of a legally defensible investigation report.
Examples & implementations
Ransomware incident analysis
Examine encryption chain, recover artifacts and determine initial access vectors.
Mobile device examination
Secure extraction of user data and app logs to reconstruct user actions.
Log-based threat attribution
Correlate network, proxy and authentication logs to identify an attacker.
Implementation steps
Establish forensic policies, chain-of-custody rules and responsibilities
Instrument logging, central collection and long-term retention
Deploy tooling, train analysts and run regular readiness exercises
⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks
Technical debt
- Outdated tools lacking support for modern filesystems
- Insufficient central log storage and retention
- No documented, repeatable forensic workflows
Known bottlenecks
Misuse examples
- Altering evidence to speed recovery without documentation
- Unauthorized forensic actions by unapproved personnel
- Incomplete log preservation prior to policy-driven deletion
Typical traps
- Unclear responsibilities cause delays in evidence preservation
- Missing timestamp synchronization complicates correlation
- Excessive alteration of originals compromises evidence
Required skills
Architectural drivers
Constraints
- • Legal frameworks and privacy constraints
- • Encrypted or inaccessible storage
- • Dependence on third-party logs in cloud environments