Data Serving
Architectural concept for reliably delivering curated data to diverse consumers with defined latency, format, and access requirements.
Classification
- ComplexityHigh
- Impact areaTechnical
- Decision typeArchitectural
- Organizational maturityIntermediate
Technical context
Principles & goals
Use cases & scenarios
Compromises
- Inconsistent views of data leading to incorrect decisions.
- Performance bottlenecks in the serving layer under peak load.
- High operational costs from uncontrolled materialization and caching.
- Define clearly measurable SLAs and SLOs for serving paths.
- Use appropriate storage engines according to access patterns.
- Version views and features, document breaking changes.
I/O & resources
- source data streams or batch exports
- schema, index and metadata definitions
- requirements for latency, consistency and access control
- served APIs, materialized views and caches
- metrics for latency, freshness and error rates
- documented SLAs and access paths for consumers
Description
Data Serving is the architectural concept of reliably delivering curated data to consumers with appropriate latency, format, and access guarantees. It encompasses APIs, materialized views, caches, and specialized serving engines to support analytics, operational workloads, and feature retrieval. Design balances freshness, scalability, cost and consistency across consumers.
✔Benefits
- Lower read latency and improved user experience.
- Decoupling backend processing and consumer workloads.
- Enables specialized optimizations for different access patterns.
✖Limitations
- Increased operational overhead from additional components like caches or stores.
- Complexity in consistency and cache invalidation across distributed systems.
- Cost due to redundant storage or specialized serving engines.
Trade-offs
Metrics
- P95 latency
95th percentile of read response times; important for SLA measurement.
- staleness (data age)
Time difference between source and served view; measures freshness.
- cache hit rate
Ratio of cache hits to requests; indicator of efficiency.
Examples & implementations
E‑commerce product catalog
Materialized views and cache layers deliver product and price data with guaranteed latency for checkout and search.
Monitoring dashboards
Aggregated metrics and time series data are provided in optimized serving engines to enable real-time alerts.
Personalized recommendations
Feature retrieval paths provide user attributes quickly to recommendation engines and synchronize with batch training data.
Implementation steps
Analyze consumer requirements (latency, volume, consistency).
Design serving paths: APIs, materialized views, caches.
Implement infrastructure, monitoring and SLOs.
Introduce incrementally and measure against defined metrics.
⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks
Technical debt
- Ad-hoc caching without clear TTL and invalidation.
- Monolithic serving components without scaling path.
- Missing versioning of served views and APIs.
Known bottlenecks
Misuse examples
- Caching critical transactional data without invalidation strategy.
- Feature serving without versioning leading to inconsistent ML inference results.
- Materialized views for rare queries causing high storage usage.
Typical traps
- Underestimating costs for replication and storage.
- Missing end-to-end validation of data quality in serving paths.
- Complex invalidation logic leads to hard-to-find bugs.
Required skills
Architectural drivers
Constraints
- • budget and cost constraints for redundant storage
- • existing data models and compliance requirements
- • limitations from third-party services or cloud quotas