Cloud Service Model
Model classifying cloud services (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS) and their responsibility, operational and integration boundaries.
Classification
- ComplexityMedium
- Impact areaTechnical
- Decision typeArchitectural
- Organizational maturityIntermediate
Technical context
Principles & goals
Use cases & scenarios
Compromises
- Vendor lock-in from unsystematic use of platform APIs
- Missing SLA boundaries lead to operational risk
- Unclear security responsibility between provider and consumer
- Document responsibilities clearly in a RACI model.
- Establish FinOps metrics to continuously monitor costs.
- Use standardized integration and auth patterns.
I/O & resources
- Technical requirements (latency, throughput, SLA)
- Compliance and security requirements
- Cost and budget constraints
- Selected service model with responsibility matrix
- Architectural principles and migration plan
- SLA and operational agreements
Description
The cloud service model categorizes delivery types such as IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS and defines responsibility boundaries. It supports decision makers in assessing abstraction levels, control trade-offs, and operational cost allocation. Choice of model affects architecture, compliance posture, billing, and integration with on-premises systems.
✔Benefits
- Faster provisioning through abstracted services
- Cost transparency and flexible scaling depending on model
- Teams can focus on core functions rather than infrastructure operations
✖Limitations
- Reduced control over underlying layers at higher abstraction levels
- Potential dependency on vendor features and APIs
- Not all legacy systems are suitable for direct SaaS or PaaS migration
Trade-offs
Metrics
- Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Total costs over lifecycle including operations, licenses and migration.
- Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR)
Average time to recover after an outage under the chosen model.
- Percentage of reused components
Measure of portability and modularity across providers.
Examples & implementations
E-commerce uses SaaS for CRM
CRM functions integrated as SaaS to reduce time-to-market; integration realized via API gateways.
Analytics platform on PaaS
Platform services (database, batch runtime) used as PaaS to increase developer focus.
Startup runs infrastructure in IaaS
Jumpstart via IaaS VMs and network infra; later staged migration to PaaS components planned.
Implementation steps
Capture requirements and define stakeholder criteria.
Evaluate service models (IaaS/PaaS/SaaS) against criteria.
Run proof-of-concept for the preferred model.
Create migration and operations plan, negotiate SLAs.
⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks
Technical debt
- Direct dependency on proprietary platform APIs without abstraction
- Incomplete documentation of responsibility and operations tasks
- Legacy components preventing full use of PaaS
Known bottlenecks
Misuse examples
- Storing critical compliance data in SaaS without contractual guarantees
- Using PaaS as a cheap IaaS alternative and ignoring platform features
- Operating IaaS infrastructure manually without automation
Typical traps
- Underestimating integration effort between cloud and on-prem
- Lack of observability in mixed service models
- Overlooked recurring costs from vendor add-on features
Required skills
Architectural drivers
Constraints
- • Regulatory constraints for data residency
- • Existing legacy systems and integrations
- • Budget constraints for operations and migration