AI Agent
Autonomous software actors that perceive, plan and act to accomplish tasks; an architectural pattern for assistants, automation and distributed systems.
Classification
- ComplexityHigh
- Impact areaTechnical
- Decision typeArchitectural
- Organizational maturityIntermediate
Technical context
Principles & goals
Use cases & scenarios
Compromises
- Misbehavior due to ill-specified goals or faulty reward models.
- Improper permissioning leads to security and privacy breaches.
- Excessive automation can reduce human oversight and obscure errors.
- Explicit interfaces and versioning for agent APIs.
- Implement fine-grained permissions and audit trails.
- Simulate and test in isolated environments before production.
I/O & resources
- Sensory or data inputs (APIs, events)
- Domain models, roles and permissions
- Goal definitions, policies and reward profiles
- Actions against systems, notifications, tickets
- Logs, metrics and decision histories
- Analyses, recommendations and training data
Description
AI agents are autonomous software entities that perceive, plan and act continuously to accomplish tasks. Used as an architectural pattern for assistants, automation and distributed multi-agent systems, they define interaction models and lifecycle concerns. This concept outlines design choices such as modularization, state management, security and integration with existing platforms.
✔Benefits
- Enable autonomous automation of complex tasks.
- Improve responsiveness and scalability via decentralized actions.
- Support modular, reusable architectures.
✖Limitations
- Require extensive data and context integration for reliable behavior.
- Challenges in complex coordination and conflict resolution between agents.
- Potential opacity in decision-making without proper explainability.
Trade-offs
Metrics
- Task success rate
Share of tasks successfully completed by agents.
- Time-to-first-action latency
Time between event and first agent-initiated action.
- Mean time to recover (MTTR)
Average time to detect and remediate misbehavior.
Examples & implementations
Intelligent chat assistants
Providing context-aware responses and actions in customer support and internal tools.
Auto-scheduling agent
Agent optimizes meetings, resources and invitations based on preferences and availability.
Multi-agent trading bots
Distributed agents simulate trading strategies and coordinate actions in financial simulations.
Implementation steps
Define agents' goals and responsibilities.
Provision data access, APIs and integration points.
Design agent architecture (Perception, Decision, Actuation).
Implement monitoring, governance and security controls.
⚠️ Technical debt & bottlenecks
Technical debt
- Ad-hoc state storage without a migration strategy.
- Tight coupling to proprietary APIs instead of clear abstractions.
- Insufficient testing and simulation infrastructure.
Known bottlenecks
Misuse examples
- Agent makes financial decisions without human oversight.
- Agent granted overly broad permissions and exfiltrates data.
- All business logic implemented inside a monolithic agent.
Typical traps
- Unclear goal definitions lead to unexpected behavior.
- Ignoring security boundaries in test environments.
- Missing observability makes root causes hard to find.
Required skills
Architectural drivers
Constraints
- • Restricted data access due to privacy regulations.
- • Limited compute capacity in edge environments.
- • Regulatory requirements for traceability.